SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 128

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Lalit Kumar Panigrahi v. State of Chhattisgarh


Advocates:
For the Applicant: [Name]
For the Respondents: [Name]

1. By way of the present criminal revision the applicant has challenged the orders dated 10-2-2014 and 5-3-2014 passed by the Special Judge ( Prevention of Corruption Act ), Durg in Special Case No. 4/1996 whereby the Court below has rejected the application preferred by the applicant under S.243(2) r/w S.294 of Cr.P.C.

2. Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding the point of issue challenged by the applicant in the instant case are as under:
The applicant at the relevant point of time was the Superintending Engineer of Special Area Development Authority (SADA), Bhilai. The Special Police Establishment, Office of the Divisional Lokayukt, Raipur registered an FIR against the present applicant and other co - accused persons under S.13(1)(d) & S.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (for short ' PC Act) and also under S.120 - B of IPC. Final report was filed by the State in August, 1996 against the applicant and 16 others for the offence u / S.13(1), S.13(2) of PC Act and 109 of IPC whereas the Court below framed charge against the applicant on 7-12-1998 for the offence u / S.13(1), S.3(2) of PC Act and the case was put to trial before the Court constituted under the




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top