Back
CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Rajan Sinha, J
Jeet Ram Rathiya – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case background and sentences. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding fine non-payment. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on judgment and extension of time. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 16) |
| 4. legal basis for prohibiting review of judgments. (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's decision to dismiss the revision. (Para 17) |
1.Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under S.397 read with S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (henceforth 'the Cr PC'), the present two applicants, namely, Jeet Ram Rathiya and Rajendra Kumar have preferred the instant revision questioning the legality and validity of the order dated 19-5-2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Raigarh in MJC No.176/2002, by which their application for extension of time to deposit the amount of fine, as directed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.391/2004 on 27-8-2012, has been rejected.
2. The present two applicants were tried and convicted by judgment dated 29-3-2004 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Raigarh in Sessions Trial No.176/2002 for offence under S.323 read with S.34 of the Indian Penal Code (henceforth 'the IPC) and under S.3
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
