SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 140

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not mentioned, J
M. Mohan Rao v. State of Chhattisgarh and Another
Transfer P. (Cri.) No. 6 of 2014



Transfer of criminal cases requires substantial grounds; mere allegations of bias are insufficient without evidence of prejudice.

Headnote:This transfer petition is filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking transfer from a Magistrate Court. The trial involved an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found no grounds for transfer based on the applicant's prior appearance and incomplete procedural nullifications. The essential issue addressed was whether a case for transfer under Section 407 was substantiated, reiterating the necessity for demonstrating legitimate grounds. The petition was denied as the applicant had failed to provide substantial evidence for the requested transfer.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction invocation requires fair trial assessment. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. evidence of coercion or procedural error is necessary for transfer. (Para 2 , 8 , 12)
3. conclusive judgments must be contested in a timely manner. (Para 6 , 10)
4. transfer petitions are denied if grounds are unsubstantiated. (Para 14 , 15)

1. Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under S.407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code'), instant transfer petition, seeking transfer from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg to another competent jurisdictional Court, has been filed by the applicant herein, who is facing trial for the offence punishable under the provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act. 1881.

2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this petition are as under: -
(2.1). On a complaint filed by respondent No. 2 / complainant - Pragyanand Sahu for offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (for short 'the Act') on 7.8.2013, the trial Magistrate has taken cognizance on 16.09.2003 and on that date offence under S.138 of the Act was registered against the petitioner herein; and further directed to issue summons on payment of process fee thereafter, the date for appearance was given on 13.12.2013 but later on it has been corrected as 28.09.2013. On 28.9.2013, applicant appeared before the Trial Court, though no summons was issued and received by him, and filed his memo of appearance; and on that date, he was released on bail upon furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Thereafter, on 20.2.2014, instant application has been filed by the applicant on the ground that learned Magistrate has acted arbitrarily and corrected the order sheet dated 16.9.2013 and acting under the influence of complainant, he was wrongly made to appear on 28.9.2013 and, therefore, his case be transferred to other Court of Sessions Division, Raipur.
(2.2). On the other hand, Shri Amiakant Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 / complainant would submit that the petitioner has failed to make out any ground for transfer of his case under S.407 of the Code.

3. In order to decide the instant transfer petition, it would be proper to notice under S.407 of the Code, which reads as under: -
'407. Power of High Court to transfer cases and appeals. - (1) Whenever it is made to appear to the High Court -
(a) that a fair and impartial inquiry or trial cannot be had in any Criminal Court subordinate thereto, or
(b) that some question of law of unusual difficulty is likely to arise; or
(c) that an order under this section is required by any provision of this Code, or will tend to the general convenience of the parties or witnesses, or is expedient for the ends of justice, it may order -
(i) that any offence be inquired into or tried by any Court not qualified under S.177 to 185 (both inclusive), but in other respects competent to inquire into or try such offence;
(ii) that any particular case, or appeal, or class of cases or appeals, be transferred from a Criminal Court subordinate to its authority to any other such Criminal Court of equal or superior jurisdiction;
(iii) that any particular case be committed for trial to a Court of Session; or
(iv) that any particular case or appeal be transferred to and tried before itself.
(2) The High Court may act either on the report of the lower Court, or on the application of a party interested, or on its own initiatives Provided that no application shall lie to the High Court for transferring a case from one Criminal Court to another Criminal Court in the same sessions division, unless an application for such transfer has been made to the Sessions Judge and rejected by him.
(3) Every application for an order under sub-section (1) shall be made by motion, which shall, except when the applicant is the Advocate - General of the State, be supported by affidavit or affirmation.
(4) when such application is made by an accused person, the High Court may direct him to




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top