SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 44

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Taresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Vinod Kumar Tekam

Table of Content
1. filing for maintenance by minor under stipulated conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's affirmation of legitimacy and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 4 , 6 , 12 , 13 , 19)
3. court scrutiny of application for dna test and legitimacy. (Para 5 , 7)

1. This revision is directed against the order dated 30.11.2013 passed by Family Court, Korba in MJC No. 100/2010 whereby the application under S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C. - ) filed by respondent herein has been allowed granting Rs.500/- monthly allowance for maintenance.

2. The application was filed by minor Sohan Kumar stating inter alia that marriage of Smt. Ratna was solemnized with Taresh Kumar applicant herein according to prevalent custom and the marital dispute between the parties was settled in MJC No. 179/2008 on 28.1.2009 before the Family Court and the Family Court directed them to live together, accordingly, the respondent's mother Smt. Ratna Bai started living with Taresh Kumar with effect from 16.02.2009; and became pregnant in the month of April, 2009 and thereafter, on the pretext of treatment, Taresh Kumar sent her to her parental house and, since then applicant has






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top