SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 56

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A.D. Sinha, J
Ram Sudhir v. State of M. P.


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None stated
For the Respondents: None stated

Table of Content
1. appeal from conviction under various ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. dispute over credibility of allegations. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court finds evidence improbable. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. final acquittal based on doubt. (Para 12)

1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 6.1.1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baikunthpur, Distt. Koriya (MP) in S.T.No.290/98 convicting the accused / appellant under S.376(1), S.506 Part - II & 346 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for seven years, to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-; to undergo RI for two years, to pay a fine of Rs.500/-; and to undergo RI for two years, to pay a fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulations respectively. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 9-7-1998 at 1 p.m. FIR (Ex.P / 1) was lodged by the prosecutrix (PW - 1), aged about 20 years, alleging therein that on the previous night at about 8 p.m. when she was returning to her house, which was on the first floor, from the house of her maternal uncle, which was on the ground floor, the accused / appellant forcibly took her to his house after dragging her















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top