SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 98

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Surendra Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05-1-1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, the then District Surguja, M.P.(now C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.310/97 whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellants guilty for subjecting Anjulata, wife of appellant Surendra (A - 1) and daughter - in - law of appellant Shantibai (A - 2), to cruelty, convicted them under S.498A of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'the IPC ) and sentenced each of the appellants to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months. The learned trial Judge acquitted the appellants from the charges under S.304B of the and also acquitted co - accused Yadunandan, father of appellant Surendra (A - 1), from the charges under S.304B and S.498A of the . Against such acquittal no criminal appeal is reported to be filed by the State.

2. Conviction is impugned on the ground that without there being any iota of evidence, court below has convicted and sentenced the appellants as aforesaid mentioned and thereby comm













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top