SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 100

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
undefined, undefined
Suresh Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

1. This revision application has been preferred by the applicant (since deceased) challenging his conviction under S.380 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and sentence of RI for 3 months and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for one month.

2. In course of hearing of this revision application on 10-4-2013 the applicant's counsel informed the Court that the applicant has died. A report was called for to ascertain the fact of death of the applicant. The concerned Station House Officer submitted a report along with the death certificate of the applicant to the effect that the applicant Suresh Tiwari has died on 19-3-2010.

3. On 18-10-2013 learned counsel for the applicant prayed for time to bring the legal heirs of the deceased applicant on record, however, no such application has been filed.

4. When the matter was called for hearing today, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the legal heirs of the applicant have not contacted him, therefore, it appears that they are not interested in prosecuting the revision application. However, he would submit that the revision application would not abate because no such provision akin
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top