SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 106

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Arun Dheemar v. State of Chhattisgarh


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not available
For the Respondents: Not available

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24-4-2002 passed by the VII th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, C. G., in Sessions Trial No.209/2000 whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellant guilty for causing homicidal death not amounting to murder of Sugriv, convicted the appellant under S.304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine Rs.5000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for 3 months.

2. Conviction is impugned on the ground that without there being any iota of evidence, the Court below convicted and sentenced the appellant as aforementioned and thereby committed illegality.

3. As per case of the prosecution, on 22-4-2000 at about 4.00 p.m., Samaru, father of the deceased, Sugriv, reached to Police Station Arang and lodged the First Information Report (Ex. - P / 3) and merg intimation (Ex. - P / 4) wherein he stated that on 21-4-2000, at about 9.00 p.m. when he was present in his neighbour Mangla' s house where marriage of her daughter was being held, th


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top