SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 125

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
P. R. Ramachandra Menon, J
Ankit Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh
Bail Application No. 2290 of 2014



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Upendra Nath Awasthy
For the Respondents: Chitranjay Patel

Ragging is established as a serious human rights abuse under the Chhattisgarh legislation, establishing liability on those responsible regardless of intent.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes the legal framework of ragging as per the CG Shaikshanik Sansthaon Me Pratara Adhiniyam, 2001, highlighting its definition and punishable aspects under the law. The facts reveal that the applicant was involved in severe ragging leading to the suicide of the victim, Nishant Upadhyay on 08.11.2014. The Court found a direct nexus between the applicant's actions and the victim’s suicide. Key issues included the interpretation of ragging and the legal responsibilities it incurs. The Court emphasized that the applicant's release could jeopardize the investigation, leading to the rejection of the bail application.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction invoked for bail application under specific ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented regarding applicant's innocence and prosecution's case. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court observes facts and context related to ragging incidents. (Para 5 , 6)
4. legal standards established on ragging definitions and implications. (Para 7 , 8)
5. conclusion based on the nexus between actions and victim's suicide. (Para 10 , 11)
6. final ruling on bail application rejection. (Para 12)

1. Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under S.439 of CrPC, the applicant herein has filed this application for grant of regular bail to him who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.317/2014 registered at Police Station, Chakradhar Nagar, District Raigarh, for the offence punishable under S.306/34 of IPC and S.4 of CG Shaikshanik Sansthaon Me Pratara (Ragging) Ka Pratishedh Adhiniyam, 2001 (for short, Adhiniyam, 2001).

2. Case of prosecution, in brief, is that, Nishant Upadhyay a student of MBBS first year studying in Late Lakhiram Agrawal Memorial Medical College, Raigarh, on 08.11.2014 at 4:30 PM in the hostel (Room No. 208 IInd Floor) being run by said college bolted the room and committed suicide by hanging himself out of humiliation and insult on account of ragging done by the present applicant and one coaccused Hiramani Patel within the meaning of S.2(a) of the Adhiniyam, 2001, and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

3. Shri Upendra Nath Awasthy, learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that present applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the case as such there is no material collected by the prosecution to connect the present applicant in crime in question. He would further submit that Nishant Upadhya had reached to the said hostel only in the late night on 7.11.2014 at 11 PM and committed suicide on 8.11.2014 at 4:30 PM and the alleged message sent through face book by the deceased to his colleague students namely; Ms. Swati Mishra, Ms. Aisha Singh and others, filed along with objection would clearly show that the said messages were sent allegedly in the month of October, whereas, he committed suicide on 8.11.2014 as in between there was sufficient time to settle and report to College / police authorities about the incident. He would further submit that in the inquiry conducted by order of Dean of said college, nothing has been found against the present applicant, he would further submit that applicant himself is a member of anti ragging committee and there is no reasonable nexus and proximity with the conduct and behaviour of the present applicant with the suicide committed by deceased Nishant Upadhyay, and no offence under S.306 of IPC and S.4 of the Adhiniyam, 2001 is made out, and he is in jail custody from 11.11.2014 as such, he is entitled to be released on regular bail.

4. On the other hand, Shri Chitranjay Patel, public prosecutor appearing for the State vehemently opposed the bail application stating inter alia that deceased was admitted in MBBS course to the said Medical College on 15.09.2014 and immediately thereafter he was subjected to ragging by the present applicant and coaccused Hiramani Patel being the seniors which is apparent from the face book messages sent by the deceased to his mother Priti Upadhyay as well as costudents Ms. Swati Mishra and Ms. Aisha Singh. He would further submit that in S.164 CrPC statement of his father Anup Upadhyay recorded by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kharsia, it would appear that on 07.10.2014 deceased Nishant sent face book message to his mother informing that his seniors including present applicant and Hiramani not only assaulted him, but also commanding him to dance at their tune and harassed him and the SMS message was repeated by the deceased to his mother which has been affirmed by Smt. Priti Upadhyay statement under S.164 of CrPC and also stated regarding harassment made by the seniors about the incident occurred on 07.10



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top