SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 6

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A. P. Bhaduri, J
Claimant – Appellant
Versus
Insurance Company – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal challenges initial compensation award against accident claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments focused on compensation assessment and income discrepancies. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's analysis includes references to relevant sections and judicial notice for updated income estimate. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. the appeal results in an increased compensation award. (Para 16)

1.This is claimants appeal against the award dated 28.2.2003, passed in Claim Case No. 3 of 2002, passed by the Chief Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Raipur, whereby as against claim of Rs. 4,67,000 an award of Rs. 1,72,000 was passed.

2.Brief facts of the case are that on 18.10.2001, a truck bearing registration No. OR 05 - D 8801, driven by the non - applicant No. 1, Shikari Uraon, dashed the deceased Tarachand, who was travelling on bicycle, whereby he sustained injuries and subsequently died. The non - applicant No. 2 is the owner of the offending vehicle and the vehicle was being insured with non - applicant No. 3, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

3. The learned Tribunal after evaluating the evidence and documents on record and taking into account the income of the deceased



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top