CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sharad Kumar Dubey, J
Bharat Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction arises from the accused's actions leading to the victim's death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented challenge the interpretation of intent and evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes circumstantial evidence and the burden of proof under specific circumstances. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.11.2010 passed by Sessions Judge, Dhamtari in S.T.No.25/2010 convicting the accused / appellant under S.302, S.177 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life, to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- and RI for six months, fine of Rs.500/- respectively with default stipulations.
2. In the present case, name of the deceased is Pramila Gond, wife of the accused / appellant. It is alleged that in the night intervening 3/4th February, 2010 the accused / appellant had a quarrel with the deceased and he assaulted her with fist blows and wooden log which resulted in her death. After her death, merg intimation Ex.P / 13 was lodged by the appellant informing the police that Pramila died on account of fall from the cot. After lodging merg, Inquest Ex.P / 2 was performed over the body of the dece
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.