CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
X, J
Nagendra Kumar Yadav v. Food Corporation of India and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis for examination of compassionate appointment eligibility. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's application and grounds for rejection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments from both parties regarding marital status. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. analysis of the fci's policies on compassionate appointments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. legal perspective on marriage as a factor in dependency. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. court's ruling on the invalidation of fci's criteria based on marital status. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. final ruling by the court allowing the petition. (Para 23) |
1. Excellent question that emanates for consideration is whether son of a deceased FCI employee can be disqualified for consideration for appointment on compassionate ground on the basis of his marriage.
2. The above - stated question arises for consideration in the following factual matrix:
3. The petitioner's father while working as Dusting Operator (Group - D service) in Food Corporation of India (for short 'the FCI'), died in harness on 30-6-2008 leading to making an application by the present petitioner being son for appointment on compassionate ground stating inter alia that on account of death of his

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.