SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 69

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
CBI – Appellant
Versus
O. P. Singhania – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the court details the background of the case regarding the application for pardon. (Para 1 , 2)
2. explains the process and implications surrounding the statements recorded and special judge's rejection. (Para 3 , 4)
3. counsel arguments regarding the credibility and necessity of the respondent's evidentiary role. (Para 5 , 6)
4. clarification by the court on the legal provisions surrounding the granting of a pardon. (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
5. final adjudication allowing the cbi's application for pardon and examination of the respondent as approver. (Para 15 , 16)

1. Challenge in this revision is to the order dated 19-5-2015 passed by the Special Judge, CBI, Raipur in Criminal Case No. RC - 1242012A0002 rejecting the application filed by the applicant - CBI, for grant of pardon to respondent - O. P. Singhania under S. 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the 'Code').

2. Facts of the case in brief are that on the basis of source information FIR was registered by the applicant vide RC - 1242012A0002 against 08 accused persons alleging commission of offence under S.7, S.8 and S.12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (for short 'the Act') read with S. 120 - B of the















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top