Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
Badri Prasad Garhewal v. Mohan Suryawanshi
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against the acquittal based on insufficient prosecution evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details surrounding the violent incident and the resulting injuries leading to death. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. clarification of the revisional jurisdiction and its limitations. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. insufficiency in trial court’s rationale in acquitting the accused. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 10-8-2006 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur whereby and whereunder learned trial Court has acquitted respondents No. 1 to 6 of the charges framed against them under S.147, S.148, S.452/149, 302/149, 323/149 (for 4 counts) of the Indian Penal Code by affording benefit of doubt, the applicant, father of deceased Ramu @ Ramkumar has filed the instant criminal revision under S.401 of the Cr.P.C.
2. The revision is filed on the ground that the order of acquittal in favour of respondents is very lenient, insufficient, against law and facts. The prosecution has proved the case against the respondents beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution witnesses are trustworthy. Common object of the culprits have been proved and the circumstances of the case are spea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
