SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 211

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
Badri Prasad Garhewal v. Mohan Suryawanshi


1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 10-8-2006 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur whereby and whereunder learned trial Court has acquitted respondents No. 1 to 6 of the charges framed against them under S.147, S.148, S.452/149, 302/149, 323/149 (for 4 counts) of the Indian Penal Code by affording benefit of doubt, the applicant, father of deceased Ramu @ Ramkumar has filed the instant criminal revision under S.401 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The revision is filed on the ground that the order of acquittal in favour of respondents is very lenient, insufficient, against law and facts. The prosecution has proved the case against the respondents beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution witnesses are trustworthy. Common object of the culprits have been proved and the circumstances of the case are speaking the truth. Ocular evidence is trustworthy, reliable and finds corroboration from the medical evidence and prompt FIR and therefore, the finding of acquittal of the respondents could not safely be recorded by learned trial Court. The respondents who are close relatives entered into the house of the deceased in the right armed with sharp edged and other deadly weapons, inflict

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top