Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Narendra alias Raj S/o Ramesh Sweeper – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case facts involving conviction and initial charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presenting the defense's claims of false implication. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 3. court's evaluation of eyewitness testimony and medical evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. deliberation on appropriate sentencing in light of revised charges. (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29-5-1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon, in S.T. No. 187/98 convicting the accused / appellant under S.307 and S.333 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulation on each count.
2. As per prosecution case, on 3-6-1998 complainant Manilal, Head Constable, along with fellow constables had gone to the vicinity where the appellant was residing, in connection with enquiry in Crime No. 150/98 in relation to offence under S.354 of IPC, there he asked the accused / appellant to accompany him to police station, on which the appellant allegedly refused to go with him and caused injury on his thigh by a Gupti (sword - cane). Immediately after the incident at 11.50 p.m., FIR (Ex. P / 1) w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
