CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Lav Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Alpa Bhargava Pandey – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the application for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented against the anticipatory bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal reasoning on the maintainability of anticipatory bail. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final decision on granting anticipatory bail. (Para 15 , 18) |
1. Apprehending arrest in connection with Complaint Case (Criminal) No.2288 of 2015 filed by Non - applicant No.2 for non - bailable offence wherein an arrest warrant has been issued, the instant application u/S. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail has been preferred by the applicant.
2. The brief facts of the case are that a complaint case was filed by Respondent No.2 Smt. Alpa Bhargava Pandey wife of Gaurav Pandey before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Raipur, for the offence u / S.354 - A, 392, 323, 294, 506 - B read with S.34 of IPC and the said complaint was filed against six persons namely Lavi Mishra, Lav Mishra, Manisha Mishra, Smt. Babita, Avani Kumar Mishra and Kush Mishra. The background of the case is that one Lavi Mishra was married to Ashish Pandey who is stated to be brother - in - law of Alpa Bhargava, the complainant. Reading
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.