SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 127

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
S. R. Dighe, J
Triloki Tiwari and 4 others – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. parties settled their dispute amicably. (Para 2 , 5)
2. high court's power to quash under section 482. (Para 4 , 10)
3. the proceedings were quashed in the interest of justice. (Para 11 , 12)

1. With consent of the parties, heard the matter finally at motion stage itself.

2. Facts in brief required for disposal of instant CRMP are that Cr. Case No. 623/2014 (State of Chhattisgarh v. Triloki Tiwari and 4 others) is pending before the judicial Magistrate First Class, Mahasamund. On 15-7-2014, the trial Court framed charges against all the accused / petitioners for offence under S.498A / 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (in brevity 'IPC' ) and S.3, S.4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act , 1961 (in brevity 'Act of 1961' ). All the accused / petitioners denied the charges. The court below recorded their pleas and listed the matter for evidence on 5-1-2016. On 5-1-2016, a joint application was filed before the trial Court by complainant Smt. Deepmala Chaturvedi, wife of Kripashankar alias Ballu along with other accused persons that they have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and hence, the compromise arrived at by the parties may be allowed and the said crimina
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top