Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Anil Kumar Das v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trial court's jurisdiction to decide confiscation. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. revisional court's improper refusal to release property. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. legal interpretation of procedural power regarding seized vehicles. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final directions for processing the supurdnama application. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. Heard.
2. Issue notice to the State.
3. Mr. R. K. Gupta accepts notice on behalf of the respondent / State.
4. Also heard on I.A. No.1, for urgent hearing and I.A. No.2, for hearing the case during summer vacation.
5. On due consideration, both are disposed of.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that looking to the entire facts as emerged in the order dated 11.12.2015 of the Trial Court and the order dated 05.05.2016 of the Revisional Court and the provisions of law, the matter may be heard finally at the motion stage itself for the prayer of the petitioner to invoke the inherent jurisdiction under S.482 of Criminal Procedure Code.
7. As prayed, heard the matter finally at the motion stage itself.
8. Facts in brief that the vehicle Truck No.CG - 13 - L - 0954 has been seized on 24.05.2015 in Crime No.287/2015 by the Bemetara Police for the offe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
