SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 176

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A K Srivastava, J
Vipin Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:[Advocate name absent]
For the Respondents:[Advocate name absent]

1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.4.1998 passed in S.T. No. 414 of 1997 by which the appellants have been held guilty of commission of offence under S.307/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for one year. The appellants have also been found guilty of commission of offence under S.450 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 5 years and fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for one year.

2. The prosecution case, unfolded from the records of the case, is that on 21st August, 1997, the appellants entered the house of one Shanti Bai where Shanti Bal was residing with other members of her family. It is alleged that the appellants declared that they have come to effect recovery on behalf of one Omprakash. Thereafter, it is alleged that the appellants opened assault with the help of knife in which Shanti Bai (PW 1) and Sudama Bai (PW 2) both were injured. Report was lodged by Badri Prasad (PW 4) in the Police Station - Baradwar on which the police registered FIR in Ext. P2 for alleged commission of offence un


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top