IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Thaneshwar and others – Appellant
Versus
Hemlal and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the legal dispute over property rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the applicability of cpc provisions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court reasoning on partition rights being continuous. (Para 10 , 19) |
| 4. judicial observations on the nature of the cause of action. (Para 21 , 24) |
| 5. final ruling on the dismissal of revisions. (Para 25) |
1. The short question for consideration in these revisions is whether second suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction is barred under O.9, R.9 of the CPC where an earlier suit for partition was dismissed in default under O.9, R.8 of the CPC.
2. Original plaintiff - Isbati (mother of non - applicant No. 1(a) and(b) herein) filed a suit for declaration of tile and permanent injunction restraining the defendant - Hiralal (father of applicants herein) from interfering with her peaceful possession. The said suit was filed against defendant - Hiralal, who also died during pendency of the suit and his legal heirs were brought on record (applicant herein). The original plaintiff claimed that she is title holder of the suit land and it was encroached by defendant Hiralal, therefore, he be restrained from interfering wit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.