SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Goutam Bhaduri, J
Smt. Gulshan Begum – Appellant
Versus
Muskan Ali – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava
For the Respondents: Mr. Ali Asgar

1. The applicants have preferred this Civil Revision under S.388(3) of the Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter called as 'the Act of 1925') against the order dated 26-4-2014 passed by learned District Judge, Bilaspur, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 9/13, by which the order passed by the Succession Court (First Civil Judge Class - I, Bilaspur) in Succession Case No. 09/08 revoking the succession certificate granted to non - applicant Nos. 1 and 2 herein - Muskan Ali and Imran Ali dated 3-2-2005, has been set aside.

2. Aforesaid challenge to the impugned order has been made on the following backdrop:

2.1 Shri Sheikh Hussain (since deceased), father of non - applicant Nos. 1 & 2 Muskan Ali & husband of applicant No. 1 - Smt. Gulshan Begum, who was working in the South East Central Railway on the post of Technician, died in harness on 4-7-2004. Non - applicant Nos. 1 and 2 herein - Muskan Ali and Imran Ali through brother of the deceased filed an application under S.372 of the Act of 1925 on 24-11-2004 seeking succession certificate in their favour for claiming service benefits of Sheikh Hussain from SECR. That application was allowed by order dated 3-2-2005 by the Succession Court and succes


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top