SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 245

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Rajendra Prasad, J
Indar Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:Government Advocate

Table of Content
1. nature of the alleged crime by the applicant. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for the applicant's bail application. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's evaluation of the applicant's risk upon release. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. final decision regarding the bail application. (Para 10 , 11)

1. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred challenging the order dated 01.02.2016 passed by the Sessions Judge, Surajpur, Distt. Surajput, in Criminal Revision No.01/2016 whereby the revision (which ought to have been appeal) preferred by the Applicant under S.12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection of Children) Act 2000 (hereinafter 'the Act, 2000') was rejected dismissing the revision against the order of rejection of bail by the Court below on 13.01.2016 in Crime No. 70/2016.

2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that the applicant, minor, and two other accused persons (who were major), are said to have engaged / hired one Bolero Car from Vindhya Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to visit Kudargarh, Chhattisgarh for religious purpose. It is said that en route the applicant along with other accused persons near Harai Nala at Biharpur, Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh, is said to have stopped the Car and












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top