Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Pritinker Diwaker, *Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, JJ.
Sunder Lal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding the admissibility and weight of evidence. (Para 2 , 9 , 11) |
| 2. facts surrounding the death of the minor. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and legal principles applied. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. final decision based on evidentiary standards and appropriate legal principles. (Para 19 , 20) |
1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 21-8-2003 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon (CG) in S. T. No. 75/2002, whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the private respondent - Uday Ram of the offence under S.302 and S.376 (1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC - ) by affording benefit of doubt. The applicant is the uncle of the deceased (name not mentioned, as per charge - sheet charge of rape also levelled against respondent No. 2 - Uday Ram) who filed the instant criminal revision under S.397 read with S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code - ).
2. The instant criminal revision has been filed on the ground that the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial Court is patently erroneous, contrary to the evidence and bad in law. The trial Cour
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
