SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 216

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
, J
Vijay Verma v. Kushal Pandey


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Shri Sunil Otwani
For the Respondent: Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal

Table of Content
1. election petition filed regarding invalid votes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on the validity of the declared invalid vote. (Para 9 , 10)
3. court's interpretation of statutory voting rules. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. declaration of the invalid vote as valid. (Para 23 , 27)
5. final directive on handling election result. (Para 29 , 31)

1. Invoking provisions contained in S.26(2) of The Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as 'Act of 1961') read with R.19(2) of The Chhattisgarh Municipalities (Election Petition) Rules, 1962 (hereinafter called as 'Rules of 1962'), the election petitioner, petitioner herein has preferred this revision calling in question the legality, validity and correctness of the impugned order dated 15.10.2015 passed by the District Judge, Bilaspur in M.J.C. No. 114/2015 by which learned District Judge / Election Tribunal has dismissed the election petition instituted by the petitioner herein under S.20 read with S.22 of the Act of 1961 and declined to the election of respondent herein / Vice - President Office of Nagar Panchayat, Bodri District Bilaspur as null & void.

2. The aforesaid challenge has been made on the following









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top