Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not Mentioned, J
Ram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family dispute over land leads to murder. (Para 4) |
| 2. defense argues lack of evidence against some accused. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. medical evidence confirms death as homicide. (Para 9 , 21) |
| 4. guilty verdict affirmed for key accused. (Para 22) |
| 5. appeal results in partial allowance. (Para 23) |
1. Appellant No.1 Ram Prasad, appellant No. 2 Ram Sharan, appellant No.3 Sukhram and appellant No. 4 Dhanaram were tried by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur in Sessions Trial No.357/1998 for offence punishable under S.302 of the IPC or in alternative, under S.302 read with S.34 of the IPC and by the impugned judgment dated 20-9-2000, they were convicted for the offence under S.302 of the IPC and each of them were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in failure to pay the fine each of them has to undergo additional RI for a period of five months.
2. Questioning the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction recorded and sentence awarded, this appeal has been preferred by the appellants.
3. During the pendency of appeal, since appellant No.1 Ram Prasad has died which has been duly recorded in the order sheet dated 8-5-2006. This
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
