Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agarwal, J
Anand Tambe v. State of Madhya Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment overview and challenge details. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. facts of the domestic dispute leading to assault. (Para 3 , 4 , 8) |
| 3. arguments concerning legality of conviction and sentencing. (Para 6 , 7 , 16) |
| 4. medical evidence and its implications for conviction. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. legal reasoning behind conviction alteration and sentencing. (Para 13 , 15 , 17) |
| 6. final ruling and orders made by the court. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.01.1995 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 220/1992, whereby & whereunder, after holding the appellant guilty for attempt to commit murder and injuries by knife to complainant Basantrao Gurjar and his son Vishwasrao Gurjar, convicted him under S.307 and S.324 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and 2 years, respectively.
2. Conviction is impugned on the ground that without there being an iota of evidence, the trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellant as aforementioned and thereby committed an illegality.
3. The undisputed facts are that complainant Basantrao Gurja
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
