SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 314

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A. K. Basi, J
Salim Memon – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Kanti Mishra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. B.P. Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Amrito Das

1. Plaintiffs namely Smt. Kanti Mishra, Sameer Mishra, Durgesh Mishra and Smt. Seema Shukla instituted a suit for eviction against defendants before the trial Court, in which present defendant / judgment debtor No. 6 - Salim Memon appeared and engaged the counsel to contest the suit, the said counsel was regularly appearing before the trial Court on behalf of petitioner and on 26.11.2009 he failed to appear before the trial Court, thereafter, the ex parte judgment & decree was passed by the trial Court on 31.03.2010 in favour of the plaintiffs.

2. Defendant No. 6 - Salim Memon / petitioner came to know about the ex parte judgment & decree passed by the trial Court only on 18.02.2012 and immediately thereafter he engaged another counsel and as per his instructions and after obtaining certified copy of the relevant documents, he filed an application under O.9 R.13 read with S.151 CPC supported by affidavit along with application for setting aside ex parte order and also filed an application under S.5 of the Limitation Act on 12.03.2012 for condoning the delay in filing the same.

3. Respondents / plaintiffs opposed the said applications stating that notice of execution of ex parte decre

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top