1. Heard on admission.

2. By this petition, the applicant has challenged the order dated 14-10-2016, by which, the application filed by the applicant under S.91 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner argued that earlier when the charge sheet was filed by the prosecution in this case, number of documents, which were sought to be relied upon by the prosecution being bulky and voluminous, were not produced during the trial proceedings. On 23-02-2016, a statement was made before the Court by the prosecution that the attempts have been made to produce the voluminous documents running into 5000 pages before the Court, but those documents were never produced by the prosecution and later on, the prosecution stated that it does not want to rely upon those documents as they are not relevant. At this stage, the petitioner moved an application under S.91 of Cr.P.C. for production of those documents, because production of those documents are relevant for the purpose of just and fair decision of the criminal case. He further submits that the prosecution has not supplied those documents to the accused, which are contained in the police report, on which, reliance