Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, J
Kamlesh Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges of document relevance for a fair trial under cr.p.c. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's power to require document production in criminal trials. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. rejection of application for production of irrelevant documents. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court resting decisions on evidence presented, not unproduced documents. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Heard on admission.
2. By this petition, the applicant has challenged the order dated 14-10-2016, by which, the application filed by the applicant under S.91 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner argued that earlier when the charge sheet was filed by the prosecution in this case, number of documents, which were sought to be relied upon by the prosecution being bulky and voluminous, were not produced during the trial proceedings. On 23-02-2016, a statement was made before the Court by the prosecution that the attempts have been made to produce the voluminous documents running into 5000 pages before the Court, but those documents were never produced by the prosecution and later on, the prosecution stated that it does not want to rely upon those documents as they are not relevant. At this stage, the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
