Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Goutam Bhaduri, J
Arjun Prasad Chandrawanshi and Another v. Dani Ram Gajanand Chandrawanshi and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural initiation and appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. fact summary and basis of charges against the respondents. (Para 3 , 5 , 8 , 12) |
| 3. evidence evaluation confirming inconsistencies and implications. (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. legal determinations regarding charge omissions and retrial necessity. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. order for retrial under s.306 ipc. (Para 28 , 29) |
1. This criminal revision has been filed by the parents of the deceased Chitrarekha under S.397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C') against the judgment dated 27/08/2002 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Mungeli in Session Trial No. 200 of 2000, whereby, the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have been acquitted from the offence punishable under S.498 - A / 34 and 304 - B / 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'). The State Government has also questioned the propriety of this judgment while filing the appeal under S.378 of the Cr.P.C., which is registered as Acquittal Appeal No. 445 of 2010.
2. Since the common questions of law and facts are involved in both these matters, therefore, they are being heard together
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
