SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 445

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
*Pritinker Diwaker, Ram Prasanna Sharma, JJ.
Bharat Das v. State of Chhattisgarh


Table of Content
1. conviction accepted based on circumstantial evidence (Para 1 , 4 , 28)
2. arguments presented by counsel for both sides (Para 7 , 8 , 21)
3. court's application of established rules of circumstantial evidence (Para 22 , 29)

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 7.9.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bemetara in S.T. No.16/10 convicting the accused / appellant under S.302, S.120 - B and 404 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and sentencing him to undergo RI for life and fine of Rs.500/-; RI for life and fine of Rs.500/- and RI for 3 years and fine of Rs.200/-, plus default stipulations, respectively.

2. In the present case, name of deceased is Bihari Das, father - in - law of accused / appellant herein.

3. Vide impugned judgment two accused have been convicted and sentenced by the trial Court, however, present accused / appellant has only challenged his conviction and till date no appeal has been filed on behalf of co - accused Pitambar, who is in custody.

4. The prosecution story, in brief, is that about a week prior to the date of incident i.e., 8.9.2009, Bihari Das (since deceased) had gone













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top