CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
*Pritinker Diwaker, Ram Prasanna Sharma, JJ.
Bharat Das v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction accepted based on circumstantial evidence (Para 1 , 4 , 28) |
| 2. arguments presented by counsel for both sides (Para 7 , 8 , 21) |
| 3. court's application of established rules of circumstantial evidence (Para 22 , 29) |
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 7.9.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bemetara in S.T. No.16/10 convicting the accused / appellant under S.302, S.120 - B and 404 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and sentencing him to undergo RI for life and fine of Rs.500/-; RI for life and fine of Rs.500/- and RI for 3 years and fine of Rs.200/-, plus default stipulations, respectively.
2. In the present case, name of deceased is Bihari Das, father - in - law of accused / appellant herein.
3. Vide impugned judgment two accused have been convicted and sentenced by the trial Court, however, present accused / appellant has only challenged his conviction and till date no appeal has been filed on behalf of co - accused Pitambar, who is in custody.
4. The prosecution story, in brief, is that about a week prior to the date of incident i.e., 8.9.2009, Bihari Das (since deceased) had gone
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.