Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Mr. , J
Ranikori Naresh Kumar Kori v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner challenges her dismissal based on caste verification. (Para 1 , 9) |
| 2. the appellant's argument hinges on state jurisdiction over caste classifications. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. the court examines constitutional laws regarding scheduled castes. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. previous rulings clarify that caste rights are state-specific. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. the court concludes that the writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. (Para 22 , 23) |
1. The petitioner was appointed as Anganbadi Assistant by the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Gourela. Her caste certificate (Scheduled Caste) issued by competent authority of the State of Madhya Pradesh was accepted and she was awarded ten marks against that. Her appointment was challenged by unsuccessful candidate by filing an appeal before the Additional Collector, Pendra Road. The appellate authority by its order dated 23.07.2014 allowed the appeal holding that the petitioner is not entitled for ten marks on the basis of caste certificate issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Action Committee on issue of Caste Certificate to SCs / STs v. Union of India, 1994 (5)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
