IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Orissa Concrete and Allied Industries Ltd. Raipur (C.G.) v. Union of India and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. preliminary contract issues and arbitration initiation. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments raised regarding injunction merits. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal standards for interim injunction applicability. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. final ruling on appeal and injunction denial. (Para 30 , 31) |
1. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether the learned arbitration court is justified in refusing interim injunction to the appellant herein filed under S.9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996, finding no merit in the said application.
2. Brief facts shorn of superfluities, essential to adjudicate the point brought before this Court are as under:
2.1. The respondent Union of India (Railways) had floated a tender for manufacture and supply of Pre - stressed Mono Block Concrete Line Sleepers (Pre - tensioned Type) for Broad Gauge (1673 mm) from existing RDSO Certified Concrete Sleeper Plants in which the appellant also participated and tender was opened on 22-4-2013 and ultimately, the contract in question was awarded to the appellant and purchase order was issued in its favour on 17-10-2013 for manufacture and supply of Pre - stressed Mono Block Concrete Lin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.