SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 449

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Balram v. Sushma


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. discussion of custody proceedings and parental responsibilities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. emphasis on child welfare and key observations from interactions. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. conclusion of the appeal leading to dismissal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

1. This is an appeal under S.47 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 (for short the Act, 1890) read with S.19(1) of the Family Courts Act , 1984 (for short the Act, 1984) challenging the order passed by the Family Court, Bemetara, allowing the respondent / wife's application / plaint for custody of minor girl Ku. Sakshi under S.25 of the Act, 1890.

2. As pleaded in the plaint filed by the wife, the parties were married about 7 years back from the date of institution of the proceedings by the respondent / wife. Two girl child namely; Ku. Ashtha & Ku. Sakshi were born out of the wedlock. On account of giving birth to two girl child, members of her in - laws' family started torturing her and the appellant / husband started threatening the wife to perform second marriage. The wife was locked in a room from morning to evening on 30-7-2011. When the lock was opened in the evening the wife was driven out of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top