IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, CJ
Chandrakumar Firturam Patel v. Rajesh Kumar Ghansiram and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction analysis under cpc (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court fee issue and trial procedure (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. expedited trial directive (Para 5 , 6) |
1. This writ petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India is instituted by the plaintiff challenging the decision rendered by the Court below on the question of sufficiency of court fee, by considering it as a preliminary issue.
2. Hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioner / Plaintiff and the learned Government Advocate, it is noted that the suit has reached the stage of trial after framing of issues. Once issues are framed, it is the mandate of R.2(1) of O.14, Rule of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; for short 'the CPC'; that the Court shall, subject to the provisions of sub-rule (2) of R.2 pronounce judgment on all issues. Sub-rule (2) of R.2 of O.14, CPC enumerates the situations in which a suit may be disposed of on an issue of law only. This means that unless the issue is one of law only, the Court cannot deal with that matter as a preliminary issue. Going to clause (a) of sub-rule (2) of R.2 of O.14, CPC, it can be seen that such issue of law should relate to jurisdiction of the Court. This is the relevant po
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.