Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
M. R. Shah, J
Sudhanshu Shekhar Shukla v. Meenakshi Trivedi and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the suit for partition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. objection raised regarding document admissibility. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on admissibility objections. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal requirements for registration and admissibility. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's decision to set aside the previous ruling. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. The present petition is against the order dated 30.11.2017, whereby the application filed under S.35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1899') raising objection about the admissibility of a document tendered during the evidence, was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of this case which would be necessary for adjudicating the dispute involved in the present petition are that present respondent No.1 Smt. Meenakshi Trivedi, Respondent No.2 Manohar Lal Trivedi, Respondent No.3 Vimal Trivedi and Respondent No.4 Snehal Trivedi had filed a suit being Civil Suit No.133 - A / 2011 before the VI Additional District Judge, Raipur against respondents Nos.5 to 21 and the petitioner for partition of the house situated within the Municipal limit of Raipur and claimed partition of 1/5th share each and preliminary decree was so
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
