SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Ranjeet Public School – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Prakash Tiwari
For the Respondents: Shri Minj, Shri Bakshi

1. Petitioner - Ranjeet Public School was granted recognition for the years 2017-2018 to admit the students from Class Nursery to class 8th and permission to run class 9th & 10th by order dated 21.03.2017 by competent authority but thereafter by the impugned order dated 06.03.2018, District Education Officer, Raigarh has revoked that recognition leading to filing of this writ petition.

2. Shri Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order passed by the District Education Officer, Raigarh is bad and unsustainable in law as second proviso to R.16(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Rules, 2010 (henceforth 'Rules, 2010') has not been complied with and, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.

3. Shri Minj, learned counsel for the State / respondent Nos. 1 to 4 would submit that the impugned order has been passed after obtaining the approval from the Collector and the matter has already been sent to the State Government for approval in accordance with law.

4. Shri Bakshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5 would submit that the petitioner - School was not granted permission to run cla


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top