Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Ranjeet Public School – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioner's recognition history. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding compliance with educational regulations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. examination of statutory requirements for recognition withdrawal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's decision to quash the order and mandate state action. (Para 8) |
| 5. final ruling on the writ petition. (Para 9) |
1. Petitioner - Ranjeet Public School was granted recognition for the years 2017-2018 to admit the students from Class Nursery to class 8th and permission to run class 9th & 10th by order dated 21.03.2017 by competent authority but thereafter by the impugned order dated 06.03.2018, District Education Officer, Raigarh has revoked that recognition leading to filing of this writ petition.
2. Shri Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order passed by the District Education Officer, Raigarh is bad and unsustainable in law as second proviso to R.16(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Rules, 2010 (henceforth 'Rules, 2010') has not been complied with and, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.
3. Shri Minj, learned counsel for the State / respon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
