SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 440

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
, J
Vijay Gupta and Another v. Dilip Patel and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Senior Counsel
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. essential facts of the contract and its enforceability. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court observations regarding joint ownership and performance. (Para 4 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments on maintainability against co-sharers. (Para 5)
4. legal reasoning for specific performance despite partition issues. (Para 10 , 11)
5. final ruling on specific performance entitlement. (Para 12)

1. This appeal is directed against impugned judgment and decree dated 18/12/2014 by which, the plaintiffs suit has only been partly decreed in the manner that though prayer for grant of specific performance of contract is rejected, advance amount paid by the plaintiff has been directed to be refunded.

2. The appellant / plaintiff filed a suit seeking decree of specific performance of contract against respondent / defendant on the pleadings inter alia that on 09/05/2008, the defendants - Dilip Patel and Kanta Ben, mother of Dilip Patel had entered into an agreement to sell the property in dispute in favour of the plaintiff. It was further pleaded that the parties had agreed for sale, for a total consideration of Rs.43,60,000/- out of which, Rs.10 lakhs was paid as advance by the plaintiff to the defendants. As pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top