SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 440

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
, J
Vijay Gupta and Another v. Dilip Patel and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Senior Counsel
For the Respondents: None

1. This appeal is directed against impugned judgment and decree dated 18/12/2014 by which, the plaintiffs suit has only been partly decreed in the manner that though prayer for grant of specific performance of contract is rejected, advance amount paid by the plaintiff has been directed to be refunded.

2. The appellant / plaintiff filed a suit seeking decree of specific performance of contract against respondent / defendant on the pleadings inter alia that on 09/05/2008, the defendants - Dilip Patel and Kanta Ben, mother of Dilip Patel had entered into an agreement to sell the property in dispute in favour of the plaintiff. It was further pleaded that the parties had agreed for sale, for a total consideration of Rs.43,60,000/- out of which, Rs.10 lakhs was paid as advance by the plaintiff to the defendants. As per the terms and conditions stipulated in the agreement, the defendant was required to remove the structure standing on the land, get all the revenue papers prepared and handed over to the plaintiff, whereafter, the plaintiff was required to get the sale deed executed on or before 30/09/2008 by paying the balance of the sale consideration. According to the plaintiff, he was re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top