IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Manish Travels (M/s) and Another v. Regional Transport Authority and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of writ petitions and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding authority and conditions for permits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's examination of statutory provisions and past judgments. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 4. clarification of regulatory powers related to carriage permits. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. Since common question of law and fact is involved in these writ petitions, they are heard analogously and are being decided by this common order.
(For the sake of convenience, W.P. (Art. 227) No.653/2014 is taken as lead case.)
2. Respondent No.2 had made an application for grant of stage carriage permit in a route from Rajnandgaon to Bailadila via Durg, Raipur, Abhanpur, Dhamtari, Kanker, Kondagaon and Jagdalpur, which was rejected by the learned Regional Transport Authority by order dated 17-7-2009; questioning that order, the said respondent preferred an appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT) and the STAT by order dated 9-3-2011 allowed the appeal holding that the Regional Transport Authority has no jurisdiction to fix the time limit for frequency of buses. Questioning that order, the petitioners herein preferred writ petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.