SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 452

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Mr. B.P. Singh, J
Sayed Nair Hasan v. Santi Singh S/o Shri Raghuvir Singh


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B.P. Singh

1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.5.2018 passed by the trial Court rejecting the petitioner's / judgment debtor's application under O.21 R.29 read with S.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter called as “CPC”).

2. Mr.B.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner / judgment - debtor, would submit that the order passed by the trial Court is unsustainable and bad in law as present is a fit case where the trial Court ought to have exercised discretion vested in it under O.21 R.29 of the CPC.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order and other documents annexed with the writ petition.

4. In the instant case, the judgment and decree was passed by the trial Court on 2.7.2013. A decree so passed has still not been executed and the petitioner / judgment - debtor has filed this application under O.21 R.29 of the CPC stating that decree passed is not 2 executable as he has filed civil suit for setting aside sale deed dated 30.11.2015/1.12.2015.

5. At this stage, it would be appropriate to notice O.21 R.29 of the CPC, which states as under: -

“29. Stay of execution pending suit between decree - holder and judgment -


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top