Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not Mentioned, J
Santosh Singh s/o Bhagwan Singh Chouhan and Another v. Devchand s/o Mehattar Satnami and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties contest the ownership and validity of property transactions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidence supports plaintiffs' claim of valid title over defendants' actions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. the appeal is dismissed due to lack of substantial questions of law. (Para 9) |
1. This Appeal has been preferred by the Defendants under S.100 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 (for short ''the CPC'') questioning the propriety of the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2007 passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazar, in Civil Appeal No.25 - A / 2006 by which, the lower appellate Court, while reversing the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2005 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Class - II, Baloda Bazar in Civil Suit No.3 - A / 2003, has decreed the Plaintiffs'' claim.
2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the Plaintiffs instituted a suit claiming declaration of title, injunction and also for possession by submitting inter alia that the suit property bearing Khasra No.727/1 admeasuring 0.178 hectares situated at Jamdih, Tehsil Baloda Bazar has been purchased by them under the registered deed of sale dated 18.03.1970 from one Darshan, S/o Paklu. According
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
