SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2629

CHHATHSGARH HIGH COURT
A.S. Naik, J
Sanjeev Yadav v. Aiaswariy Mandavi


1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 11.09.2015 passed in Civil Suit No.04 - A / 2014 by District Judge, Dhamtari whereby, the appellants suit for grant of decree of specific performance has been dismissed.

2. Appellants / plaintiff filed a suit seeking decree of specific performance of contract on the pleadings that the defendant No.1 had entered into an agreement to sell the disputed property on 28.06.2013 (Ex.P / 3) for a consideration of Rs.78,00,000/- (Rs. Seventy - Eight Lac only), out of which Rs.21,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty - one lac only) were paid in advance. Later on, another agreement dated 28.12.2013 (Ex.P / 4) was executed, under which, the period within which the balance amount was to be paid, was extended and the plaintiffs paid a further amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rs. Six Lac only). Thus, total amount of Rs.27,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty - Seven Lac only) were paid by the plaintiff to the defendant No.1 from time - to - time at the time of execution of two agreements. Under the agreement, there were specific conditions requiring the defendant to obtain permission from the competent authority for sale of land and also to get the property relea



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top