Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Ram Prasanna Sharma, J.
Janak Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Ram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal relates to validity of sale deed executed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding sale and family necessity. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and applicability of hindu law. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling reverses previous court's decision regarding the sale. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. This appeal is preferred under S.96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment / decree dated 21-3-2005 passed by the Additional District Judge (FTC), Kabeerdham (CG) in Civil Suit No. 6 - A / 2003 wherein the said court declared sale deed void executed by late Tokhan in favour of appellant Janak Ram as per Ex.D / 3 and sale deed executed in favour of respondents Shri Ram, Shiv Kumar and late Badhri as per Ex.D / 34 and subsequent sale deed executed by Janak Ram in favour of respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and in favour of Shri Ram, Shiv Kumar and late Badhri and declared title of respondent No.1 Ganesh Ram and respondent No.2 Anju and also granted decree of injunction.
2. Respondent No.1 / plaintiff is son of Tokhan and respondent No.2 is also son of Tokhan. Respondent No.1 / plaintiff filed a suit for declaration / permanent injunction and for declaring
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
