Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not Mentioned, Not Mentioned
Geeta Bai and Others v. Surya Bahadur Yadav and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident details and initial claims for compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' arguments regarding negligence and compensation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. claimants' rebuttal of negligence evidence and compensation arguments. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 28) |
| 4. court's analysis of contributory negligence standards. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. assessment of income, future prospects, and compensation adjustments. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. final findings on compensation adjustments and directives for insurance. (Para 23 , 24 , 29) |
1. Appellants - claimants have questioned the legality and propriety of the impugned award dated 7.9.2013 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (hereinafter referred to as 'Claims Tribunal') in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 33 of 2013 whereby learned Claims Tribunal allowed the claim application in part and awarded a total sum of Rs. 1,43,000 as compensation in a death case.
2. Facts relevant for disposal of this appeal are that on 17.1.2012 at about 2 p.m., Anuruddha Singh Dewangan was travelling on his bicycle and going to Dhamtari from his village Surpa, while so, when he reached near the house of o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
