1. Final hearing of this second appeal has been taken - up through video conferencing.

2. The substantial questions of law involved, formulated and to be answered in this second appeal preferred by the appellants / defendants are as under: -
"1. Whether the first appellate Court was justified in holding that defendant Nos.1 to 4 had executed a gift deed with regard to the suit property in favour of the plaintiff, by recording a finding which is perverse and contrary to the record ?
2. Whether the first appellate Court was justified in holding that plaintiff is in possession of the suit property and thereby, granting decree for permanent injunction in his favour ?"
[For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred hereinafter as per their status shown and ranking given in the suit before the trial Court].

3. The dispute relates to the property left by Parau and his wife Sumrit Ba