CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Presiding Judge, J
Hare Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
1. These two bail applications under S.438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C.') have been filed by the applicants directly before the High Court without availing the remedy before the Sessions Court. On 21 August, 2020 when these two bail applications were listed separately, this Court posted the same for hearing on maintainability.
2. On 16 September, 2020 learned counsel appearing for the applicants placed reliance on an order passed by another Single Bench of this Court in Ratnesh Singh Chouhan v. State of Chhattisgarh , MCRCA No.918 of 2019 [decided on 23-7-2019] to argue that anticipatory bail applications can be filed directly before the High Court. However, finding that, the Single Bench in Ratnesh Singh Chouhan (supra) has not specifically dealt with the issue as to whether in each and every case, an application under S.438 of the Cr.P.C. filed directly before the High Court would be maintainable or such application can be entertained only in rare or exceptional cases, therefore, to settle the issue the matter was referred to be decided by a larger Bench. Subsequently, these bail applications have been placed before us.
3. Applicant in MCRCA No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.