Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
string, string
Narhari Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of fir and initial charges. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments questioning prosecutrix's age and evidence credibility. (Para 3) |
| 3. state's stance supporting the lower court's decision. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's examination of prosecutrix's credibility and evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. final decision to acquit based on lack of evidence. (Para 8) |
1. FIR (Ex - P - 4) lodged by Firanta (PW - 2) - the grandfather of the prosecutrix discloses that on 09.09.2005, the accused - appellant removed the prosecutrix from her lawful guardianship took her to various places and kept her with him for number of days. FIR also discloses the date of birth of prosecutrix to be 18.04.1989 and, as such, she has been branded as minor on the date of incident. On the basis of FIR offences under S.363 and S.366 IPC were registered against the accused - appellant. After the prosecutrix got back, she was sent for medical examination, her statement under S.161 Cr. P.C. also recorded and after completion of investigation charge - sheet was filed against the accused - appellant under S.363, S.366, S.506 - B and 376 IPC, and so also the charge was framed under the same sections.
2. Learned Court below vide j
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
