CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay Kumar, J
Manisha Saloman v. Kalawati Saloman
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of the maintenance tribunal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. supervisory powers under article 227. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. claims for residence and eviction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. limitations of the tribunal's jurisdiction. (Para 24 , 25) |
1. Heard.
A preliminary objection has been raised by the respondent side that the writ petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India, filed by the petitioner, is not maintainable. The order under challenge in this petition, has been passed by the tribunal constituted under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short "the Act, 2007") and the same is not a Civil Court. Relying on the judgment of this Court dated 01.12.2015 passed in WPC No. 2113 of 2015 between Dr. Ram Sharan Lal Tripathi v. State of Chhattisgarh and others, it is submitted that this Court has held that the Board of Revenue is not a Civil Court, therefore, this petition is not maintainable.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner opposes the submissions, preliminary objection and the submissions made in that respect. It is submitted that the High Court of Calcutta has decided the similar petition filed under Art.227 of the Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.