CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Arup Kumar Goswami, J
M/s. Raipur Construction Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bilaspur Smart City Limited – Respondent
1. All these writ petitions are connected together by a common thread of the same texture. The subject matter relates to the tender floated by the Respondent - Bilaspur Smart City Limited. The challenge raised is against cancellation of the Second tender (after cancelling the First tender) and in respect of the subsequent / Third tender proceedings, besides the instance of blacklisting the parties concerned and other incidental aspects.
2. The main points that arise for consideration are:
(a) Whether the repeated cancellation of the tender floated by the Respondent - Bilaspur Smart City Limited is with intent to extend undue favours to anybody of choice of the Respondents?
(b) Whether the blacklisting of the Tenderer ordered by the Respondent - Bilaspur Smart City Limited without issuing any show - cause notice is correct or sustainable in law?
(c) Whether the disqualification of the Petitioner - Company in WPC No. 2390/2020 and WPC No. 2396/2020 (M/s. Raipur Construction Pvt. Ltd.) in the Second round of tender is correct or justified?
(d) Whether the disqualification of the Petitioner in WPC No. 2860/2020 and WPC No. 2872/2020 (M/s. Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Ltd.)
Gorkha Security Services v. Government (NCT of Delhi) and others
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B. S. Muddappa and others
Union of India and others v. Dinesh Engineering Corporation and Another
Lt. Governor, NCT and others v. Ved Prankish alias Vedu
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.