Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Arup Kumar Goswami, J
M/s. Raipur Construction Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bilaspur Smart City Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of tender disputes and considerations (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial scrutiny of decision making process (Para 3 , 9 , 30 , 35) |
| 3. chronology and consequences of tender cancellations (Para 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. disqualifications and allegations against bidders (Para 5 , 10 , 12 , 19 , 26) |
| 5. legal principles on blacklisting and notice requirements (Para 11 , 20 , 22 , 24) |
| 6. final decisions on disqualifications and tenders (Para 29 , 36 , 38) |
| 7. court orders and directions to proceed with tenders (Para 40 , 42 , 43) |
1. All these writ petitions are connected together by a common thread of the same texture. The subject matter relates to the tender floated by the Respondent - Bilaspur Smart City Limited. The challenge raised is against cancellation of the Second tender (after cancelling the First tender) and in respect of the subsequent / Third tender proceedings, besides the instance of blacklisting the parties concerned and other incidental aspects.
2. The main points that arise for consideration are:
(a) Whether the repeated cancellation of the tender floated by the Respondent - Bilaspur Smart City Limited is with intent to extend undue favours to anybody of choice of the Res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
