Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
, J
Vinay Dubey and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners filed for bail due to alleged late filing of charge-sheet. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding statutory limits for charge-sheet filing. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. clarification on the indefeasibility of the right to default bail. (Para 8 , 10 , 17) |
| 4. judicial observation on the right to default bail and inclusion of holidays in computation. (Para 9 , 14 , 20) |
| 5. final decision to allow petitioners bail application. (Para 22 , 23) |
1. The petitioners have filed present Cr. M. P. for quashing of the order dated 12.04.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS), Balodabazar - Bhatapara in connection with Crime No. 110/2021 whereby an application filed by the petitioners under S.167(2) of Cr. P. C. for grant of default bail was rejected on the count that charge - sheet has not been filed within 60 days.
2. The petitioners were charged for offence punishable under S.22(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act'). It is the case of prosecution is that from possession of petitioner No.1, 145 strips of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus total 1160 capsules and from the possession of petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
