SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2775

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Shripal Meshram v. Urmila Meshram


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:[Advocate Name(s)]
For the Respondents:[Advocate Name(s)]

1. This appeal by the appellant / husband under S.19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 would call in question the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court, Rajnandgaon, refusing to dissolve marriage between the parties.

2. Earlier by judgment and decree dated 27-10-2014 passed by the Family Court, Rajnandgaon, in civil suit No.72 - A / 2011 allowed the suit of the husband (appellant herein) to dissolve the marriage between the parties. However, in FAM No.112 of 2014 preferred by the wife (respondent herein) the judgment and decree was set aside by this Court vide judgment dated 7-7-2017 and the matter was remitted back to the trial Court for rendering fresh judgment. The remand order was made for the reason that on the earlier occasion the trial Court had only reproduced all statements of witnesses made in the affidavit under O.18 R.4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'the CPC') and recorded finding in respect of cruelty without any discussion or appreciation of evidence. This Court found that in most of the paragraphs either pleadings have been reproduced or the statements made by the parties under O.18 R.4 of the CPC were reproduced.

3. The facts of the case,
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top